Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3008
Title: | International criminal justice: a dialogue between two cultures |
Authors: | Teles, Patrícia Galvão Kowalski, Mateus Moita, Luís Rodrigues, Almiro Santos, Sofia Neves, Miguel Santos Soares, Miguel de Serpa |
Advisor: | Saraiva, Maria Francisca |
Keywords: | International law Criminal justice |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Publisher: | OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
Abstract: | The implementation of the idea that individuals, wherever they are and regardless of their official status, may be accountable for crimes against humanity breaks away from the Westphalian paradigm that each State is responsible for prosecuting (or not) its citizens. After the Cold War, several international criminal jurisdictions were created, namely the ad hoc courts for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda and a permanent criminal jurisdiction, the International Criminal Court (ICC). Power no longer serves as a means for impunity in the same way. Those leaders involved in conflicts have learned to fear international criminal justice as a “sword of Damocles”. On the other hand, the creation of international criminal jurisdictions has become a means to consolidate peace in post-conflict situations so as to restore justice. |
Peer Reviewed: | no |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3008 |
ISBN: | 978-989-8191-73-1 |
Appears in Collections: | OBSERVARE - Livros e Capítulos de Livros |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
International criminal justice.pdf | 1,75 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.