Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/11144/6622
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLeandro, Francisco José-
dc.contributor.authorOberoi, Roopinder-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T15:27:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-02T15:27:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.issn1647-7251-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/6622-
dc.description.abstractUkraine’s Westward drift has been countered by Russia’s invasion. This conflict marks a dramatic escalation of rivalry and a momentous crossroads for global security, symbolizing a clear alteration in the world’s security milieu from a unipolarity to one demarcated by a revival of Cold War competitiveness and global reconfiguration of power balance. Some political analysts view it as a manifestation of the Kremlin’s growing antipathy towards the U.S., NATO, and implicitly the EU’s post–Cold War expansionism into the erstwhile USSR’s sphere of influence. Response from the global community toward the invasion of Ukraine has been mixed: there has been an array of condemnations that is pushing the international community to a New Cold War, (re)aligning the EU, NATO, and the U.S. on a number of key issues, but many have staked a tacit, condoning stance that prioritizes the protection of their own immediate interests. Meanwhile, ideological, nuclear and economic powers such as China and India have adopted strategic ambivalence towards the invasion. China, as a member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), and as an alternative ideological power house, is also facing a sort of paradox with Chinese characteristics. India, as the world’s sixth largest economy and an emerging power devoted to self-reliance, has seized the opportunity to capitalize on the Russia-India-China trilateral strategic cooperation. This is significant, as, together, China and India account for more than half of all FDI-inflow to low- and middle-income countries. However, as the war wears on, the appeal of any initial constructive neutrality begins to backfire. For China, it damages its branding of peaceful options, severs its economic partnerships with the EU, and reinforces the trade-war antagonist perceptions in relation to the U.S. in light of the looming isolation of Russia. The 2024 U.S. presidential elections will likely add more uncertainty. Ultimately, this research illuminates how India and China’s involvement may impact the EU’s security. The research uses an inductive methodology and combines analyses of events, qualitative primary sources, key media references, the realism school of international relations, and it is organized as follows: (1) Introduction: The new Cold Power Play and Hot War; (2) Decoding India’s Strategic Ambivalence; (3) EU and China: Diplomatic aloofness or constructive engagement? (4) China-Russia: Paradox with Chinese Characteristics; (5) Conclusionpt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherOBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboapt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectEuropean Unionpt_PT
dc.subjectUkraine Warpt_PT
dc.subjectÍndiapt_PT
dc.subjectChina Popular Republicpt_PT
dc.subjectRussian Federationpt_PT
dc.subjectStrategic Ambivalencept_PT
dc.subjectNeutralitypt_PT
dc.titleUkraine Geopolitical European Flashpoints vis-à-vis India and China: From Ambivalence to Strategic Engagementpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
degois.publication.locationLisboapt_PT
degois.publication.titleJANUS.NET e-journal of International Relations. Vol.14, n.1 - Thematic dossier: European Union-China relationspt_PT
degois.publication.volumevol. 14, nº1 TD1pt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0123.5pt_PT
Aparece nas colecções:OBSERVARE - JANUS.NET e-journal of International Relations. Vol.14, n.1 - Thematic dossier: European Union-China relations



FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.