Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11144/4421
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSousa, RICARDO Real P.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T15:31:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-28T15:31:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationSousa, Ricardo Real P . (2017) United Nations Security Council primacy over military interventions in Africa and the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), em Moita, Luís e Pinto, Luís Valença (Coord.) Espaços económicos e espaços de segurança. Lisboa (519-572): UAL; OBSERV ARE. ISBN 978-989-8191-73-1; e-ISBN 978-989-8191-79-3por
dc.identifier.isbn978-989-8191-73-1-
dc.identifier.issn978-989-8191-79-3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/4421-
dc.description.abstractWith the end of the Cold War there is a reassertion of regionalism in the international system. In terms of security, this process has the potential to challenge the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) primacy on decisions over military interventions. This paper investigates this possibility in Africa using a revised version of the historical structure of Robert Cox with elements of conventional constructivism. The results are that: the idea of regionalization of security returned to the academic agenda since the 1990s; inter-organizations norms and policies developed to accommodate an exception to UNSC primacy in cases when the African Union (AU) is awaiting a UNSC decision; there is a significant number of military interventions without UNSC authorization between 1990 and 2010, but after 2010 there is no new military intervention without UN SC authorization or recognition; the low capacity of actors in Africa prevents a more interventionist policy without UN SC authorization, but South Africa and to a less extent Nigeria have the potential to shape interventionism in Africa alongside other countries which are capable and willing to engage in sporadic military interventions in their sub-regions. The paper concludes that the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), centered at the AU, has the potential to decrease the likelihood of civil war initiation if it works consistently and based on clear guidelines as a security guarantee for governments.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherOBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboapor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectInternational Relationspor
dc.subjectCold Warpor
dc.subjectUnited Nations Security Councilpor
dc.subjectAfrican Unionpor
dc.titleUnited Nations Security Council primacy over military interventions in Africa and the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA)por
dc.typebookPartpor
degois.publication.firstPage519por
degois.publication.lastPage572por
degois.publication.locationLisboapor
degois.publication.titleEspaços económicos e espaços de segurança.por
dc.peerreviewednopor
Appears in Collections:OBSERVARE - Livros e Capítulos de Livros

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AF_Espaços económicos e espaços de segurança_final.pdf577.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.